Eldon Warman; Republic Vs Democracy- A Great Read!
REPUBLIC VS DEMOCRACYPART TWO

In the mid 70s - The Iconic Rock Band Rush- Spoke about the New World Order! Few Can relate this concept to the Nation of Canada like Eldon Warman
A democracy gives the people the privilege of choosing their leader [or ruler]. Remember, a “right” is forever; a “privilege” is given [and can be taken away] by the granting authority. A democracy is, in essence, a fraudulent conception to give the illusion of the real form of government the people desire when they are “infected” by the germ of the Filioque. Democracy is based upon the “God Is” only concept. That leaves mankind in a relationship to this God concept akin to the relationship of a dairy farmer to his cattle. They have to be directed and herded. When milk production stops, the cow becomes useless to the dairy farmer; so, its off to the abattoir. Calves (especially males) are “veal. Human babies are aborted, etc.etc.
When the people of Upper Canada began to stir from this “infection” in the 1830-1860 period from the influence of the USA [William Lyon McKenzie, Joseph Papineau, et al.], the British government homogenized a pseudo-republican government for Canada, our current Parliamentary system. It serves no one except the oligarchs of the Holy Roman Empire and its international financial barons and their minions.
(Yes folks - The Holy Roman Empire and the Pontifex Maximus - the title Augustus Caesar bestowed upon himself in 63 BC., is still with us, in the Vatican. Prior to this, the title belonged to the high priest of the Persian Persian cult residing at the present site of the Vatican since about 300 BC., until Emperor Constantine’s conversion around 336 AD.)
The BNA Act of 1867 was the FRAUD of the century. The front page of the document was not part of the private bill passed by the British Parliament in the Spring of 1867. That page, the preamble, denoted the purpose of the bill. It made reference to the desire of the Provinces to federate. The result of this private bill was to recognize the four colonies and territory north of the USA as one colony, the Dominion of Canada. No original copy of this Act exists in a Province, or Ottawa. Such would be the case if there was actually a contract to confederate.
Government was by “corporate sole”, an absolute dictator, a Governor General. Sovereignty [eminent domain] rested in him. Sovereignty or Eminent Domain was turned over to the [ People of the] Provinces in 1931 [Statute of Westminster]; and, since then, NO legitimate governments have existed at the Federal or Provincial levels in Canada. In 1950, the Supreme Court verified this by stating: The Government of Canada governs by “Custom, Convention and Tradition” ….[not by lawful right]. See: “Canada, A Country Without A Constitution”
Pierre Trudeau’s repatriated Constitution Act of 1982 is a void contract for want of Quebec’s signature and for want of ratification by the People of Canada. The Constitution is law from the people unto the government; not a body of laws from government unto the People. The 1950 Supreme Court decision [1950] also said that the Constitution belongs to the People, not to the Provinces or to the Federal Government.
So, what’s wrong with democracy? Majority rule; and, the will of the majority would seem to be a most desirable state. The will of the majority invariably becomes very destructive when that majority uses its power to plunder the minority. When the majority [or influential power block] is feeding at the public hog trough and the minority [or silent majority] are the wealth producers, such a democracy rapidly destructs. The wealth producers eventually refuse to produce, or, are hamstrung by increased taxation.
The medium of exchange of property [money] inflates [or, more appropriately, devalues] and property and wealth gravitates to a few, causing a cycle back to tyranny. The NAFTA treaty appears to be an attempt by the subservient New World Order drones of this democracy [and, those in the USA] to plunder Mexican labour and stave off the inevitable hyper-inflation of Canadian and US money. As you may know, Canadian and US Money only has value if the people have confidence in it. It has no intrinsic value as it is not a contract to exchange any item of value as gold and/or silver based money was.
Another factor which has crept like a thief in the night into our society is the Roman person or corporation. This figment of imagination gives great power and limited liability to a soulless entity. Roman persons are used as a front for commercial businesses and government bodies. These Roman persons (entities) operate under Roman law and principles; and, by their very nature are cruel, dictatorial and without mercy.
Western nation’s governments have been using a tactic during this century [actually, this deceit began in 1300 England] to impose controls on the people of their countries by the use of licenses and assumpsit contracts. The assumpsit contract is used to covertly change a man’s status from full liability volitional man to that of a legal entity called a “person”. A license is a signed confession of guilt for committing a crime; and, as such, it changes the licensee into a convicted criminal on parole. That man is then subject to “warden authority” control as a ward of the Crown. Common Law rights are lost. Section 39 of the Magna Carta (1225 - the first official version) forbids the “outlawing” of a free will man in this manner. Section 63 says that the rights declared in the Magna Carta are “for ever”.
A constitutional prohibition of this activity by government should be imposed to stop this usurpation of natural ‘unalienable’ rights. The prohibition would include any form of licensing of absolute Anglo-Saxon common law rights; and, the prohibition of assumed contracts which changes the status of a free will man or woman, or their property to a legal entity. If such status changes are desired by the concerned parties, those changes must be properly declared by and in the public record.
For instance, driver’s licenses are used as a ‘guilty plea’ and a signed confession of guilt. Police are given “warden” authority; rather than ‘peace officer’ authority over ‘drivers’. The confiscation by the Province or State of the New Vehicle Identification Statement (NVIS) or Manufacturers Certificate of Origin(MCO) of all automobiles sold at the dealer level, and the registration by the Province or State of an gives it the status of a ‘legal entity’, thus making the owner a ‘ward of the Crown’ as a confessed criminal(license), with the ‘privilege’ of possession of that automobile.
So, how does the trinity concept tie in with the idea of a republic? First, a republic must recognize the supremacy of God, or, if you prefer, the Creator. God exercises His (or, Her, if you prefer) supremacy through His Law, which we call the Common Law - the negative and positive Golden Rule. Next, we must recognize that we, and our fellow man, each have within us the spark of creativity - a Godly attribute - bestowed upon us by God - which falls into category two. And third, we must accept and understand that we, on this ever decreasing in size planet are all one family; and must accept the responsibilities of being part of this family - the third part of trinity.
Therefore, A Constitutional Republic with Anglo-Saxon Common Law follows these essential precepts :
1. The people, the free will men and women living within the national boundaries, are sovereign [maintain underlying and dominant authority] and are subservient only to Creator God. The people are not to be considered as a ‘crew’, as indicated by the term ‘People’.
2. The People choose [by secret ballot] representatives [public servants]to form a government [a committee - not a corporation] to do only that which they can’t do individually or collectively. ‘Bodies politic’, political organizations, must remain unincorporated. Political boundaries must remain as a division of convenience; and not as a boundary of a make-believe ship, a Roman style corporation.
3. The Law of the Land is the negative Golden Rule [Do not unto others as you would not they do unto you]. Social justice arises from the Positive Golden Rule. The ‘enforcement’ of law only applies to the negative Law. The positive Law must remain a totally moral responsibility.
4. Law enforcement remains in the hands of the People through the jury system. Judges must only be ‘referees’ and helpful advisors to the jury in matters of procedure, conduct and protocol.
5. The Law of the Sea and international relations derives from Maritime Law, also known as Admiralty Law when applied to military matters. Such a system of individual freedom threatening laws must remain outside the nation’s boundaries, or be very specific and with full revelation when affecting men [m/f] through terms of an international contract.
6. The constitution is a contract between the People and their Government. It is the job description and the limitations of policing power of the government. A contract obligates both ways with the People’s obligations being financial support and participation in the Posse Comitatus [able bodies men] between the ages of 18-45 in time of war or invasion). In the US Constitution, the Federal Government is directed to maintain a Navy because of the Admiralty [Maritime] jurisdiction or authority to control ‘felonies and piracy at high sea’.
7. Money must be a tangible asset, with paper money and computer account entries made legal promissory notes based upon lawful money. This system exists, but is not used, in the USA or Canada. Historically, lawful money has been backed by gold and/or silver where the paper money is redeemable in the precious metal in an amount determined by a pre-fixed value of that precious metal. In the future, that precious metal value will likely be determined by a representative world government for ease of exchange of goods. The Moslem world is now moving to that concept in their ‘Gold Dinar’.
8. Individual rights and freedoms must take precedent over community, with due process of law for property confiscated for debt; and, just compensation for property taken in eminent domain for public use. Confiscation in eminent domain can only take place where that which is confiscated can be replaced with something of like value. It is this which prohibits government from confiscating the primary right of ‘life’, and the supportive rights of ‘liberty’, property, and the pursuit of happiness.
George Mason, in June of 1776, presented his “‘Virginia Declaration of Rights’. It is well worth reading to understand what some of the true patriots were thinking and espousing in the age of the Founding Fathers, many of whom proved to be traitors to the American people who desired to live under the Anglo-Saxon common law. Thomas Jefferson ‘conveniently’ left out the property right in his Declaration of Independence, a document with obvious plagerizations from Mason’s document.
As the land army [organized militia] was under the Common Law, call-up was placed under State government. The Federal Government was not given authority to act under the Common Law [Calling out the Posse Comitatus]. All Federal police activities in the USA are blatantly contrary to the US Constitution because they are imposing the Laws of the Sea over the supposed sovereign People on the Land; the same as King George was doing in 1776 resulting in the American Revolution. Their government is getting away with this because they adopted [by questionable authority] a “Triple E” Senate, which effectively nullified the “checks and balances” system and by malusage of eminent domain.
Police should be under a totally separate authority from the executive, legislative or judicial branches of state or provincial government. Historically, this was by a ‘high sheriff’ and county sheriff with deputies. This organization must be under very strict limitations and full liability under the negative Law.
The original People’s (USA) controlling mechanism of the Federal US government was under Article 5 of the Articles of Confederation [1777]:
[a] “For the more convenient management of the general interest of the United States, delegates shall be annually appointed in such manner as the legislature of each State shall direct, to meet in congress on the first Monday in November, in every year, with a power reserved to each State, to recall its delegates, or any of them, at any time within the year, and to send others in their stead, for the remainder of the year.
[b] No State shall be represented in Congress by less than two, nor more than seven members; and no person shall be capable of being a delegate for more than three years in any term of six years; nor shall any person, being a delegate, be capable of holding any office under the United States, for which he, or other of his benefit receives any salary, fees, or emolument of any kind.
[c] Each State shall maintain its own delegates in a meeting of the States, and while they act as members of the Committee of the States. Comment : [The Peoples' contract oversight committee, a type of jury, the contract then being these Articles, and later, the US Constitution].
[d] In determining questions in the United States — in Congress assembled, each State shall have one vote. Comment :[ "United States" means District of Columbia and Federal Government of the United States of America. The definition has to do with Eminent Domain, a topic for another time] — Comment :[The Committee of the States had the power of legislation veto; and, recall of individual elected or appointed government officials or the firing of the total government, just as the King or Governor had when the USA States were colonies of Britain]. Congress means committee assembled in meeting.
[e] Freedom of speech and debate in Congress shall not be impeached or questioned in any court, or place out of Congress, and the members of Congress shall be protected in their persons from arrests and imprisonments, during the time of their going to and from, and attendance on Congress, except for treason, felony, or breach of the peace.
Apparently, the US Senate, as established in the original US Constitution, replaced the Committee of the States; but some USA patriots argue that it did not, that the devious controllers of the US Government have hoodwinked the People out of their built-in safeguard of the Republic. The US Senate is a Roman corporation or fictitious person. The United States of America is a Common Law country; and, as such, the basic oversight committee must operate as natural persons acting in committee, as in a church where oversight committees supervise contract work on their church.
Therefore, without the Committee of the States [which is a Common Law committee rather than a Roman corporation], and the conversion of the Senate by the lawfully questionable 17th Amendment to a “Triple E” Senate, making that body responsive only to their political party and their big financial supporters, the way was paved to abolish the American Republic, and bring it to its present state of being as an autocratic and fascist democracy. If you don’t accept that statement, ask the thousands of political prisoners in American jails and prisons, and those many, many others outlawed by railroad Federal Courts in Admiralty jurisdiction in violation of Article 20 and 24 of the Magna Carta. The prison business is the greatest growth industry in the United States of America. The latest count shows one person in 155 is in jail or prison in the USA.
9. To maintain individual freedom, taxes for any individual person must be voluntary, as a safety check on the abusive spending by government. Both the United States and Canada have income tax acts that appear to mandate a tax collection by distraint; however, the governments actually collect the tax and force people to file tax returns using Admiralty jurisdiction, changing the status of citizens to a legal entity called a “taxpayer”, and enforcing a pseudo-contract called an “assumpsit contract”. Lord Blackstone [circa 1785] informed the Commoners of England that they had two ways to maintain control over their government - [1] by secret ballot and; [2] by refusing to pay taxes; thus, indicating that taxes are voluntary to a Commoner. The status of Canadians was clearly established in the Statute of Westminster whereby they gained equality with British citizens [cancellation of admiralty jurisdiction].
Unfortunately, Lord Blackstone can be seen as a protector of the fraud that is the ‘British common law’. It was/is only a variation of maritime law brought unto the land, with a common or frequent use of the ‘notwithstanding’ clause that is ever present on a ship, or make-believe ship. More about this at: Treason.
10. Another basic right of the People which MUST be kept in place by strong and effective safeguards, especially where any level of government is the primary litigant against a citizen; and, that is a jury system. In such litigation, both the [totally impartial] Grand and Petty jury must protect the citizen against the otherwise all powerful government with its limitless resources of money and manpower. Juries should be called ONLY by, and under the authority of, the ’sheriff’.
11. Land ownership is by allodial [land as a valuable asset] title; and, not as we now have, life leases and fealty title from government. If your land can be taken from you by the government for non payment of taxes — it is not an allodial title. The type of tenancy in Alberta is called “free socage”. Allodial title may not be the best system in modern society where the unregulated use of the property may be severely detrimental to the ‘peace’ within the community. Rather than change the present system, there needs to be constitutional limitations upon government relative to claiming ownership of produce from such lands, and the amount of the rents [taxes] assessed and collected.
The inability to read, especially legalese jargon, is the causative factor resulting from the decrepit education generally available in public school systems. If the aim of the despot is to deceive, the means are evident in the writing of statutory law. Try reading the Income Tax Act. To the free people of a republic, taxes [paying for expenses incurred by government] is a moral, not a legal obligation. To pay so-called taxes to a spend-thrift Government which has turned our money into debt certificates; and, who has sold our Country to hostile foreign powers - the International Banking interests, constitutes treason in itself.
Many people in Canada have immigrated from a background that didn’t benefit from the Filioque doctrine. One doesn’t have to accept Christian theology to contemplate this philosophic objective. The Greek philosopher Plato developed the idea of the republic without benefit of formal religion, although the earlier Salem [2000 BC Jerusalem] teachings obviously reached into later Greece. Consider what might be accomplished if all three philosophic approaches to Trinity were utilized in not only our social and civic endeavour; but current problems such as the environment and the values of humanity. A stable and technologically advanced society must not only use a balance of these three philosophic approaches to Trinity; but, must ever strive to improve on them.
The “God Is” only philosophic school sincerely believe, and are ever quick to express the opinion that society would descend into chaos and mob violence without strong authoritarian leadership. The Swiss example readily refutes this belief. Switzerland is possibly one of the only countries that has survived, and in a peaceful manner, for 700 years as a multicultural nation. Their secret has been the application of sound republican principles for themselves; however, Switzerland has become the home base of many of the organizations imposing totalitarian schemes on the rest of the World.
If the idea of a COMMON LAW REPUBLIC appeals to you, organize a planning group in your Province to actively promote the idea; and, to start educating your fellow free will man and woman. The object would be a Province wide constituent assembly to decide on the type of government to have and a constitution to control it. You, the people are sovereign. You have no one in all the World above you except the Creator God, the Father (or Allah, Brahma, Yahweh, El Elyon, or whatever your religious tradition may call our common and universal Creator). To God’s People, governments are servants. Don’t lose sight of this very important fact.
END
BY: ELDON G. WARMAN
BACK TO: PART ONE of REPUBLIC
GO TO: COMMON LAW
CLIMB INTO MY (CLICK ON) BEECHCRAFT BONANZA
AND WE’LL HEAD BACK HOME
REPUBLIC VS DEMOCRACYPART TWO
A democracy gives the people the privilege of choosing their leader [or ruler]. Remember, a “right” is forever; a “privilege” is given [and can be taken away] by the granting authority. A democracy is, in essence, a fraudulent conception to give the illusion of the real form of government the people desire when they are “infected” by the germ of the Filioque. Democracy is based upon the “God Is” only concept. That leaves mankind in a relationship to this God concept akin to the relationship of a dairy farmer to his cattle. They have to be directed and herded. When milk production stops, the cow becomes useless to the dairy farmer; so, its off to the abattoir. Calves (especially males) are “veal. Human babies are aborted, etc.etc.When the people of Upper Canada began to stir from this “infection” in the 1830-1860 period from the influence of the USA [William Lyon McKenzie, Joseph Papineau, et al.], the British government homogenized a pseudo-republican government for Canada, our current Parliamentary system. It serves no one except the oligarchs of the Holy Roman Empire and its international financial barons and their minions.
(Yes folks - The Holy Roman Empire and the Pontifex Maximus - the title Augustus Caesar bestowed upon himself in 63 BC., is still with us, in the Vatican. Prior to this, the title belonged to the high priest of the Persian Persian cult residing at the present site of the Vatican since about 300 BC., until Emperor Constantine’s conversion around 336 AD.)
The BNA Act of 1867 was the FRAUD of the century. The front page of the document was not part of the private bill passed by the British Parliament in the Spring of 1867. That page, the preamble, denoted the purpose of the bill. It made reference to the desire of the Provinces to federate. The result of this private bill was to recognize the four colonies and territory north of the USA as one colony, the Dominion of Canada. No original copy of this Act exists in a Province, or Ottawa. Such would be the case if there was actually a contract to confederate.
Government was by “corporate sole”, an absolute dictator, a Governor General. Sovereignty [eminent domain] rested in him. Sovereignty or Eminent Domain was turned over to the [ People of the] Provinces in 1931 [Statute of Westminster]; and, since then, NO legitimate governments have existed at the Federal or Provincial levels in Canada. In 1950, the Supreme Court verified this by stating: The Government of Canada governs by “Custom, Convention and Tradition” ….[not by lawful right]. See: “Canada, A Country Without A Constitution”
Pierre Trudeau’s repatriated Constitution Act of 1982 is a void contract for want of Quebec’s signature and for want of ratification by the People of Canada. The Constitution is law from the people unto the government; not a body of laws from government unto the People. The 1950 Supreme Court decision [1950] also said that the Constitution belongs to the People, not to the Provinces or to the Federal Government.
So, what’s wrong with democracy? Majority rule; and, the will of the majority would seem to be a most desirable state. The will of the majority invariably becomes very destructive when that majority uses its power to plunder the minority. When the majority [or influential power block] is feeding at the public hog trough and the minority [or silent majority] are the wealth producers, such a democracy rapidly destructs. The wealth producers eventually refuse to produce, or, are hamstrung by increased taxation.
The medium of exchange of property [money] inflates [or, more appropriately, devalues] and property and wealth gravitates to a few, causing a cycle back to tyranny. The NAFTA treaty appears to be an attempt by the subservient New World Order drones of this democracy [and, those in the USA] to plunder Mexican labour and stave off the inevitable hyper-inflation of Canadian and US money. As you may know, Canadian and US Money only has value if the people have confidence in it. It has no intrinsic value as it is not a contract to exchange any item of value as gold and/or silver based money was.
Another factor which has crept like a thief in the night into our society is the Roman person or corporation. This figment of imagination gives great power and limited liability to a soulless entity. Roman persons are used as a front for commercial businesses and government bodies. These Roman persons (entities) operate under Roman law and principles; and, by their very nature are cruel, dictatorial and without mercy.
Western nation’s governments have been using a tactic during this century [actually, this deceit began in 1300 England] to impose controls on the people of their countries by the use of licenses and assumpsit contracts. The assumpsit contract is used to covertly change a man’s status from full liability volitional man to that of a legal entity called a “person”. A license is a signed confession of guilt for committing a crime; and, as such, it changes the licensee into a convicted criminal on parole. That man is then subject to “warden authority” control as a ward of the Crown. Common Law rights are lost. Section 39 of the Magna Carta (1225 - the first official version) forbids the “outlawing” of a free will man in this manner. Section 63 says that the rights declared in the Magna Carta are “for ever”.
A constitutional prohibition of this activity by government should be imposed to stop this usurpation of natural ‘unalienable’ rights. The prohibition would include any form of licensing of absolute Anglo-Saxon common law rights; and, the prohibition of assumed contracts which changes the status of a free will man or woman, or their property to a legal entity. If such status changes are desired by the concerned parties, those changes must be properly declared by and in the public record.
For instance, driver’s licenses are used as a ‘guilty plea’ and a signed confession of guilt. Police are given “warden” authority; rather than ‘peace officer’ authority over ‘drivers’. The confiscation by the Province or State of the New Vehicle Identification Statement (NVIS) or Manufacturers Certificate of Origin(MCO) of all automobiles sold at the dealer level, and the registration by the Province or State of an gives it the status of a ‘legal entity’, thus making the owner a ‘ward of the Crown’ as a confessed criminal(license), with the ‘privilege’ of possession of that automobile.
So, how does the trinity concept tie in with the idea of a republic? First, a republic must recognize the supremacy of God, or, if you prefer, the Creator. God exercises His (or, Her, if you prefer) supremacy through His Law, which we call the Common Law - the negative and positive Golden Rule. Next, we must recognize that we, and our fellow man, each have within us the spark of creativity - a Godly attribute - bestowed upon us by God - which falls into category two. And third, we must accept and understand that we, on this ever decreasing in size planet are all one family; and must accept the responsibilities of being part of this family - the third part of trinity.
Therefore, A Constitutional Republic with Anglo-Saxon Common Law follows these essential precepts :
1. The people, the free will men and women living within the national boundaries, are sovereign [maintain underlying and dominant authority] and are subservient only to Creator God. The people are not to be considered as a ‘crew’, as indicated by the term ‘People’.
2. The People choose [by secret ballot] representatives [public servants]to form a government [a committee - not a corporation] to do only that which they can’t do individually or collectively. ‘Bodies politic’, political organizations, must remain unincorporated. Political boundaries must remain as a division of convenience; and not as a boundary of a make-believe ship, a Roman style corporation.
3. The Law of the Land is the negative Golden Rule [Do not unto others as you would not they do unto you]. Social justice arises from the Positive Golden Rule. The ‘enforcement’ of law only applies to the negative Law. The positive Law must remain a totally moral responsibility.
4. Law enforcement remains in the hands of the People through the jury system. Judges must only be ‘referees’ and helpful advisors to the jury in matters of procedure, conduct and protocol.
5. The Law of the Sea and international relations derives from Maritime Law, also known as Admiralty Law when applied to military matters. Such a system of individual freedom threatening laws must remain outside the nation’s boundaries, or be very specific and with full revelation when affecting men [m/f] through terms of an international contract.
6. The constitution is a contract between the People and their Government. It is the job description and the limitations of policing power of the government. A contract obligates both ways with the People’s obligations being financial support and participation in the Posse Comitatus [able bodies men] between the ages of 18-45 in time of war or invasion). In the US Constitution, the Federal Government is directed to maintain a Navy because of the Admiralty [Maritime] jurisdiction or authority to control ‘felonies and piracy at high sea’.
7. Money must be a tangible asset, with paper money and computer account entries made legal promissory notes based upon lawful money. This system exists, but is not used, in the USA or Canada. Historically, lawful money has been backed by gold and/or silver where the paper money is redeemable in the precious metal in an amount determined by a pre-fixed value of that precious metal. In the future, that precious metal value will likely be determined by a representative world government for ease of exchange of goods. The Moslem world is now moving to that concept in their ‘Gold Dinar’.
8. Individual rights and freedoms must take precedent over community, with due process of law for property confiscated for debt; and, just compensation for property taken in eminent domain for public use. Confiscation in eminent domain can only take place where that which is confiscated can be replaced with something of like value. It is this which prohibits government from confiscating the primary right of ‘life’, and the supportive rights of ‘liberty’, property, and the pursuit of happiness.
George Mason, in June of 1776, presented his “‘Virginia Declaration of Rights’. It is well worth reading to understand what some of the true patriots were thinking and espousing in the age of the Founding Fathers, many of whom proved to be traitors to the American people who desired to live under the Anglo-Saxon common law. Thomas Jefferson ‘conveniently’ left out the property right in his Declaration of Independence, a document with obvious plagerizations from Mason’s document.
As the land army [organized militia] was under the Common Law, call-up was placed under State government. The Federal Government was not given authority to act under the Common Law [Calling out the Posse Comitatus]. All Federal police activities in the USA are blatantly contrary to the US Constitution because they are imposing the Laws of the Sea over the supposed sovereign People on the Land; the same as King George was doing in 1776 resulting in the American Revolution. Their government is getting away with this because they adopted [by questionable authority] a “Triple E” Senate, which effectively nullified the “checks and balances” system and by malusage of eminent domain.
Police should be under a totally separate authority from the executive, legislative or judicial branches of state or provincial government. Historically, this was by a ‘high sheriff’ and county sheriff with deputies. This organization must be under very strict limitations and full liability under the negative Law.
The original People’s (USA) controlling mechanism of the Federal US government was under Article 5 of the Articles of Confederation [1777]:
[a] “For the more convenient management of the general interest of the United States, delegates shall be annually appointed in such manner as the legislature of each State shall direct, to meet in congress on the first Monday in November, in every year, with a power reserved to each State, to recall its delegates, or any of them, at any time within the year, and to send others in their stead, for the remainder of the year.
[b] No State shall be represented in Congress by less than two, nor more than seven members; and no person shall be capable of being a delegate for more than three years in any term of six years; nor shall any person, being a delegate, be capable of holding any office under the United States, for which he, or other of his benefit receives any salary, fees, or emolument of any kind.
[c] Each State shall maintain its own delegates in a meeting of the States, and while they act as members of the Committee of the States. Comment : [The Peoples' contract oversight committee, a type of jury, the contract then being these Articles, and later, the US Constitution].
[d] In determining questions in the United States — in Congress assembled, each State shall have one vote. Comment :[ "United States" means District of Columbia and Federal Government of the United States of America. The definition has to do with Eminent Domain, a topic for another time] — Comment :[The Committee of the States had the power of legislation veto; and, recall of individual elected or appointed government officials or the firing of the total government, just as the King or Governor had when the USA States were colonies of Britain]. Congress means committee assembled in meeting.
[e] Freedom of speech and debate in Congress shall not be impeached or questioned in any court, or place out of Congress, and the members of Congress shall be protected in their persons from arrests and imprisonments, during the time of their going to and from, and attendance on Congress, except for treason, felony, or breach of the peace.
Apparently, the US Senate, as established in the original US Constitution, replaced the Committee of the States; but some USA patriots argue that it did not, that the devious controllers of the US Government have hoodwinked the People out of their built-in safeguard of the Republic. The US Senate is a Roman corporation or fictitious person. The United States of America is a Common Law country; and, as such, the basic oversight committee must operate as natural persons acting in committee, as in a church where oversight committees supervise contract work on their church.
Therefore, without the Committee of the States [which is a Common Law committee rather than a Roman corporation], and the conversion of the Senate by the lawfully questionable 17th Amendment to a “Triple E” Senate, making that body responsive only to their political party and their big financial supporters, the way was paved to abolish the American Republic, and bring it to its present state of being as an autocratic and fascist democracy. If you don’t accept that statement, ask the thousands of political prisoners in American jails and prisons, and those many, many others outlawed by railroad Federal Courts in Admiralty jurisdiction in violation of Article 20 and 24 of the Magna Carta. The prison business is the greatest growth industry in the United States of America. The latest count shows one person in 155 is in jail or prison in the USA.
9. To maintain individual freedom, taxes for any individual person must be voluntary, as a safety check on the abusive spending by government. Both the United States and Canada have income tax acts that appear to mandate a tax collection by distraint; however, the governments actually collect the tax and force people to file tax returns using Admiralty jurisdiction, changing the status of citizens to a legal entity called a “taxpayer”, and enforcing a pseudo-contract called an “assumpsit contract”. Lord Blackstone [circa 1785] informed the Commoners of England that they had two ways to maintain control over their government - [1] by secret ballot and; [2] by refusing to pay taxes; thus, indicating that taxes are voluntary to a Commoner. The status of Canadians was clearly established in the Statute of Westminster whereby they gained equality with British citizens [cancellation of admiralty jurisdiction].
Unfortunately, Lord Blackstone can be seen as a protector of the fraud that is the ‘British common law’. It was/is only a variation of maritime law brought unto the land, with a common or frequent use of the ‘notwithstanding’ clause that is ever present on a ship, or make-believe ship. More about this at: Treason.
10. Another basic right of the People which MUST be kept in place by strong and effective safeguards, especially where any level of government is the primary litigant against a citizen; and, that is a jury system. In such litigation, both the [totally impartial] Grand and Petty jury must protect the citizen against the otherwise all powerful government with its limitless resources of money and manpower. Juries should be called ONLY by, and under the authority of, the ’sheriff’.
11. Land ownership is by allodial [land as a valuable asset] title; and, not as we now have, life leases and fealty title from government. If your land can be taken from you by the government for non payment of taxes — it is not an allodial title. The type of tenancy in Alberta is called “free socage”. Allodial title may not be the best system in modern society where the unregulated use of the property may be severely detrimental to the ‘peace’ within the community. Rather than change the present system, there needs to be constitutional limitations upon government relative to claiming ownership of produce from such lands, and the amount of the rents [taxes] assessed and collected.
The inability to read, especially legalese jargon, is the causative factor resulting from the decrepit education generally available in public school systems. If the aim of the despot is to deceive, the means are evident in the writing of statutory law. Try reading the Income Tax Act. To the free people of a republic, taxes [paying for expenses incurred by government] is a moral, not a legal obligation. To pay so-called taxes to a spend-thrift Government which has turned our money into debt certificates; and, who has sold our Country to hostile foreign powers - the International Banking interests, constitutes treason in itself.
Many people in Canada have immigrated from a background that didn’t benefit from the Filioque doctrine. One doesn’t have to accept Christian theology to contemplate this philosophic objective. The Greek philosopher Plato developed the idea of the republic without benefit of formal religion, although the earlier Salem [2000 BC Jerusalem] teachings obviously reached into later Greece. Consider what might be accomplished if all three philosophic approaches to Trinity were utilized in not only our social and civic endeavour; but current problems such as the environment and the values of humanity. A stable and technologically advanced society must not only use a balance of these three philosophic approaches to Trinity; but, must ever strive to improve on them.
The “God Is” only philosophic school sincerely believe, and are ever quick to express the opinion that society would descend into chaos and mob violence without strong authoritarian leadership. The Swiss example readily refutes this belief. Switzerland is possibly one of the only countries that has survived, and in a peaceful manner, for 700 years as a multicultural nation. Their secret has been the application of sound republican principles for themselves; however, Switzerland has become the home base of many of the organizations imposing totalitarian schemes on the rest of the World.
If the idea of a COMMON LAW REPUBLIC appeals to you, organize a planning group in your Province to actively promote the idea; and, to start educating your fellow free will man and woman. The object would be a Province wide constituent assembly to decide on the type of government to have and a constitution to control it. You, the people are sovereign. You have no one in all the World above you except the Creator God, the Father (or Allah, Brahma, Yahweh, El Elyon, or whatever your religious tradition may call our common and universal Creator). To God’s People, governments are servants. Don’t lose sight of this very important fact.
END
BY: ELDON G. WARMAN
BACK TO: PART ONE of REPUBLIC
GO TO: COMMON LAW
CLIMB INTO MY (CLICK ON) BEECHCRAFT BONANZA
AND WE’LL HEAD BACK HOME










Leave your response!
You must be logged in to post a comment.